The Ballerina Farm controversy has drawn public interest, highlighting the complicated lives of the Neeleman family, especially Hannah Neeleman and her husband, Daniel. The couple is known for their social media presence, where they share a charming story of farm life mixed with ballet aspirations. However, concerns about the real condition of their farming operation have arisen, causing many to doubt the truth of their depiction.
This article provides a full overview of the Ballerina Farm controversy. With insights from Business2Community, we will look into the facts about the Neeleman family’s experience, examining the gap between their social media images and the real-life difficulties they encounter. By highlighting Hannah’s duties, Daniel’s goals, and how their decisions affect their children, we hope to give a clearer picture of the situation.
Ballerina Farm Controversy – Key Facts
- The Ballerina Farm controversy stems from the perceived gap between Hannah Neeleman’s picture-perfect portrayal of farm life on social media and the real, challenging aspects of running a farm and raising eight children.
- A profile by The Sunday Times highlighted the pressures and sacrifices Hannah faces, sparking public debate over the authenticity of her “tradwife” lifestyle and the strain on her family.
- Following the article, Hannah faced both support and criticism online, with many questioning the sustainability and transparency of the lifestyle she promotes.
The Story of the Ballerina Farm Controversy
The Ballerina Farm controversy has arisen from growing concerns about transparency and how the Neeleman family’s lifestyle was being portrayed. Critics contend that Ballerina Farm’s pristine and almost utopian depiction on social media could mislead viewers about the realities of farming and home life.
The controversy gained momentum following an article in The Times, which highlighted the discrepancies between Hannah Neeleman’s carefully crafted online persona and the true nature of their family’s situation.
Who is Hannah Neeleman?
Hannah Neeleman is known for her transition from dancer to devoted mother and farmer, capturing the essence of her aspirations to nurture both her family and her dreams. With a background as a world pageant queen and a dancer, Hannah aims to build a life that aligns with her values while raising eight children alongside her husband, Daniel, whose father is the CEO of Breeze Airways, David Neeleman.
Hannah is also a content creator, sharing her family-oriented lifestyle on social media, largely showcasing heartwarming moments against the picturesque backdrop of her farm in rural Utah.
However, her rise to fame has brought her into the eye of a social media storm regarding her portrayal of life as a traditional wife or “tradwife”, which has faced criticism and scrutiny.
With a following exceeding 18 million across TikTok and Instagram, Neeleman’s posts feature everything from home-baked goods to children’s activities, sparking both admiration and concern.
What is a “Tradwife”?
A “tradwife”, or traditional wife, is a term that describes women who embrace traditional gender roles, often focusing on homemaking, child-rearing, and supporting their husbands. This trend is mainly associated with creators who identify as Christian, particularly within the Mormon community.
Nearly 100 million posts feature the “tradwife” hashtag on TikTok, promoting the concept of a nuclear family with conventional gender roles.
Leading accounts in the trad wife sphere include Ballerina Farm, Nara Smith — known for crafting items from sunscreen to bubblegum by hand — and Estee Williams, who shares insights on women’s “biblical submission” to their husbands.
Advocates argue that women should have the freedom to define their roles within the household and family dynamics, even when these roles may seem traditional or subordinate. They suggest that by cultivating large followings, influencers are not just adhering to conventional norms but also establishing successful businesses.
Taking into account views, video durations, algorithmic factors, and the TikTok creator fund, some speculate that popular figures like Nara Smith and Hannah Neeleman could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars each month from their highly viewed content. That’s not even taking into account any sponsored deals.
This concept has garnered attention within modern discourse, prompting both admiration and backlash. Within the context of the Ballerina Farm narrative, Hannah’s portrayal as a “tradwife” has prompted discussions about the pressures and expectations placed on women who strive to conform to such ideals.
While the allure of the “tradwife” lifestyle may appeal to many, it also raises questions about the realities of sustaining it, especially when engaged in the demanding world of farming while being pregnant and raising babies.
What is Ballerina Farm?
Ballerina Farm is the brand name for Hannah Neeleman’s social media accounts and the family-run business on their expansive 328-acre ranch in Kamas, Utah.
The brand showcases a traditional homesteading lifestyle, featuring scenes of bread- and butter-making, cow-milking, and homeschooling, attracting a massive online following.
The name Ballerina Farm is a nod to Hannah’s background as a trained ballerina combined with her current life on the farm with her husband, Daniel.
The couple, co-CEOs of Ballerina Farm, also sell a variety of products, including dairy, meat, and kitchen goods, through their farm-based business.
The Times Interview and The Public’s Response
In July 20, 2024, The Sunday Times published an in-depth profile on Hannah and Daniel Neeleman, which sparked controversy.
The article dubbed Hannah “the Queen of the tradwives” and highlighted some of the more challenging aspects of her life, such as severe exhaustion and the lack of childcare support, since Daniel wanted the house to be nanny-free.
Although the article showcased the joy Hannah found in being a mom, it also brought to light the sacrifices she made, such as giving up her ballet career and coping with the demands of raising eight children without outside help.
Hannah revealed that she enjoyed the one epidural she had during her eight births. Her husband, Daniel, acknowledged that Hannah sometimes becomes so exhausted that she can’t get out of bed for a week.
Since the profile’s publication, her Instagram comment section has been inundated with a mix of positive messages and critical advice, including remarks like “Girl, run”.
Additionally, an old, since-deleted TikTok video resurfaced, showing Daniel giving Hannah an egg apron for her birthday, instead of the vacation to Greece she had hoped for, followed by his terse “you’re welcome”, which some viewers perceived as passive-aggressive.
Megan Agnew, the journalist who wrote the original profile, released a follow-up piece addressing the backlash she faced. Agnew, who has no children herself, acknowledged criticism that she didn’t fully understand the realities of Hannah’s life.
However, she explained that being on the farm gave her a deep understanding of the demanding and intimate nature of raising eight children without childcare. The profile also highlighted moments that shed light on Hannah’s day-to-day challenges, such as when her son repeatedly interrupted her during the interview, prompting her to ask him to stop.
When asked why she doesn’t show more of the difficult aspects of her life, Hannah explained that she prefers to focus on the joy she finds in making beautiful meals for her family and hopes to inspire others to do the same. She also noted that her Mormon faith influences her values and decisions, including her approach to family planning.
Despite the intense scrutiny, the tone of the Ballerina Farm accounts remains unchanged. One of Hannah’s posts soon after the articles were published featured a video of her and Daniel in a field, accompanied by one of their children and a herd of cows. The post was to promote their upcoming line of homemade dairy products.
View this post on Instagram
How Ballerina Farm Reacted to the Backlash
Eleven days after the Times profile’s publication, Hannah addressed the backlash in a video on Instagram.
She expressed surprise and disappointment at how the article portrayed her family, claiming it was an attack on her family and married life.
View this post on Instagram
Hannah emphasized that the portrayal of her as “oppressed” and Daniel as the cause of this oppression was completely inaccurate. She reiterated that for her and Daniel, their faith and family are their top priorities and that marrying Daniel was the best decision she had ever made.
In a follow-up post with a link in her bio to Ballerina Farm’s About Us page, Hannah addressed many of the polarizing details from the article. She reaffirmed that she and Daniel had always wanted a large family and had left their family planning in God’s hands:
While dating we had talked about when to start a family. There was no hesitation from either of us. We came from big families, (we are both one of nine) and wanted a big family. So we left it in God’s hands. I thought he would want me to finish school before sending me our firstborn Henry. We plan, God laughs.
The Consequences of the Ballerina Farm Controversy
The backlash surrounding the Ballerina Farm profile has affected Hannah and Daniel Neeleman and ignited broader conversations about gender roles, the “tradwife” movement, and its implications for women in contemporary society.
The tradwife movement romanticizes the 1950s domestic ideal, which they view as a time of prosperity and strong family values. This nostalgia is seen as a reaction to the economic and social challenges of modern life, where traditional, Western gender roles are no longer the norm.
Some critics argue that tradwives are increasingly associated with white nationalist ideologies. Their promotion of traditionalism often intertwines with racist views, emphasizing the preservation of white heritage and the preservation of specifically eurocentric families.
Another critique is that the tradwife movement capitalizes on women’s fears of sexual objectification and violence, promoting chastity, marriage, and motherhood as protective measures. However, critics argue this is a misleading and harmful narrative.
Additionally, Hannah’s narrative particularly resonates with those who have chosen similar lifestyles, yet it raises critical questions about agency and choice in the context of modern motherhood and household responsibilities. Tradwives often criticize feminism, claiming it has deprived women of the joys of motherhood and domestic life. They argue that modern feminism has led to increased objectification and sexual violence, proposing traditionalism as a solution.
As the Ballerina Farm brand continues to thrive amidst the controversy, it illustrates the complexities of modern parenthood and marriage, leaving many to ponder the deeper societal implications, including perceptions of motherhood, expectations of women, and the ongoing discourse surrounding the role of men in traditionally feminine spaces.
What Can We Learn From the Ballerina Farm Controversy?
The Ballerina Farm controversy highlights several key lessons that resonate within personal narratives and a business perspective.
First, authenticity is vital; the backlash against Hannah’s portrayal shows how public figures can be misconstrued and how perceived insincerity can damage a brand.
For entrepreneurs, maintaining transparency across platforms like social media can strengthen trust and loyalty among followers. The reactions to Hannah’s experiences as a mother of eight, deeply intertwined with her faith and values, emphasize the importance of connecting on a human level — something that can exacerbate or alleviate a business’s reputation.
The discourse surrounding Hannah and Daniel Neeleman’s life invites a broader examination of gender roles and societal expectations, particularly regarding women’s options in family life and career paths.
As consumers increasingly engage with brands that align with their values, understanding the implications of these dynamics can lead to more informed business decisions. As we witness the rise of movements that either empower or constrain women, such as the “tradwife” phenomenon, business leaders must navigate these waters sensitively. This includes acknowledging the anxieties many face regarding motherhood, the perceived societal pressures, and the discussions surrounding parenting that impact audience perception.
In essence, the Ballerina Farm story teaches us that in the ever-evolving landscape of our culture, businesses that adapt to the nuances of their audience — whether that means addressing concerns about authenticity, understanding the complexities of family dynamics, or simply being relatable — are more likely to thrive.
As we observe and learn from these interactions, we must sincerely hope to forge connections that recognize the vast tapestry of individual experiences, including those who watch from diverse backgrounds. The situation serves as a reminder that in the crowded marketplace, it’s the stories and the people behind the brands that resonate most profoundly with consumers.