CFTC, SEC Starting to Realize That Enforcement Isn’t Enough to Build Regulatory Framework for Crypto

The recent court ruling favored Ripple in the SEC vs. Ripple case, leading to discussions about its impact on the crypto industry and regulations. According to Timothy Massad, a former chair of the CFTC, the ruling might influence how businesses and lawmakers approach cryptocurrencies.

Still, it won’t drastically change how the SEC and CFTC enforce rules.

Ripple court ruling makes call for regulation ‘more compelling and more urgent’ — former CFTC chair https://t.co/b5llKtKgHK pic.twitter.com/PlR3XK1IMO

— Mantica Crypto (@ManticaCrypt) July 17, 2023

Massad and former SEC Chair Jay Clayton wrote an op-ed arguing that clear regulations are necessary to protect investors and ensure a fair market. They stressed the importance of providing clear guidelines and rules that help investors understand their rights and promote fair practices in the crypto industry.

Massad and Clayton think having clear regulations for cryptocurrencies is essential to handle their complexities and protect people in the market, despite the Ripple ruling being somewhat important.

Ripple Ruling’s Impact on Investor Protection and Market Integrity

Massad and Clayton wrote an article questioning the effectiveness of SEC and CFTC lawsuits in improving investor protection and market integrity in the crypto industry. Even before the recent Ripple court ruling, they had these concerns, which stated that XRP is not a security.

However, the ruling doesn’t necessarily prevent the SEC from using the Howey test to identify securities.

Hence, the judge’s comments about institutional investors’ expectations regarding Ripple’s use of funds raise questions about Ripple’s holdings and the possibility of an SEC appeal or new laws.

The article highlights uncertainties in regulating cryptocurrencies and their impact on market participants.

Regulatory Clarity and the Role of Enforcement

According to Massad, the Ripple ruling highlights the limitations of creating a crypto regulatory framework solely through enforcement actions. He argues that regulatory authorities must work collaboratively to establish standards and guidelines focused on investor protection and market integrity.

Massad suggests that the SEC and CFTC should consider joint efforts or establishing a self-regulatory organization to develop these standards.

While the ruling may exclude XRP from immediate regulatory action, Massad doubts that enforcement cases brought by the SEC or CFTC will decrease significantly.

Ripple Ruling as a Catalyst for Legislative Action

The Ripple court decision could encourage U.S. lawmakers who have been slow to look at laws affecting the crypto industry. The House Financial Services Committee is now examining a draft bill on market structure. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand have brought back a bill aimed at establishing a complete regulatory framework for digital assets.

Massad believes the ruling strengthens the argument for legislative action and underscores the urgency for establishing investor protection standards beyond enforcement measures.

Related News:

• Former SEC Chair Says BlackRock Bitcoin ETF “Incredible Development,’’ Outlines Approval Criteria
• Bitcoin Probes $31K as Key US Inflation Data Looms – Here’s Where the BTC Price Could Be Headed Next